Finlex ®

Konvention om domstols behörighet och om verkställighet av domar på privaträttens område

Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgements in Civil and Commercial Matters

Osapuolet

• ALANKOMAAT

  Sitoutumispäivä: 23.01.1990 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1992
  Varauma:

  Alueellinen soveltaminen: Sovelletaan Euroopassa sijaitsevaan kuningaskuntaan.

• BELGIA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 31.07.1997
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.10.1997

• ESPANJA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 30.08.1994 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.11.1994

• IRLANTI

  Sitoutumispäivä: 27.09.1993 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.12.1993

• ISLANTI

  Sitoutumispäivä: 11.09.1995 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.12.1995
  Varauma:

  Pursuant to art. VI of Protocol no. 1 of the said Convention, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs would like to inform the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs that art. 77 of the Civil Proceedings Act no. 85/1936, to which is referred in art. 3 of the Convention, has been repealed and replaced by art. 32, paragraph 4 of the new Civil Proceedings Act no. 91/1991.
  
  Chapter III of the law on arrest and injunction (lög um kyrrsetningu og lögbann) to which art. 54A (7) of the said Convention refers has been repealed and replaced by Chapter IV of the law on arrest and injunction (lög um kyrrsetningu og lögbann) No. 31 from 23 April 1990, which entered into force on 1 July 1992.

• ISO-BRITANNIA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 05.02.1992 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.05.1992
  Varauma:

  The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, having conidered the Convention, hereby confirm and ratify the same in respect of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland only, but reserving the right to extend the Convention at a later date to any territory for whose international relations the Government of the United Kingdom is responsible.
  
  Recalling that in its instrument of ratification of the Convention the Government of the United Kingdom reserved the right to extend the Convention at a later date to any territory for whose international relations the Government of the United Kingdom are responsible, I hereby declare, on behalf of the Government of the United Kingdom, that the Convention shall apply to Gibraltar being such a territory.
  
  I further declare that the following provisions of the Convention shall be implemented in Gibraltar in the manner specified below.
  
  Article 3 - the refernce with respect to the United Kingdom in the second paragraph to certain rules enabling the founding of jurisdiction shall apply mutatis mutandis to Gibraltar; .
  
  Article 30 - the reference to the United Kingdom in the second paragraph shall apply to Gibraltar also;
  
  Article 32 - an application for enforcement of a judgment shall be submitted to the Supreme Court of Gibraltar, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Magistrate´s Court on transmission by the Attorney General of Gibraltar;
  
  Article 37 - under paragraph 1 of the Article an appeal against a decision authorising enforcement shall be lodged with the Supreme Court of Gibraltar, or in the case of a maintenance judgment with the Magistrate´s Court on transmission by the Attorney General of Gibraltar; under paragraph 2 of the Article the judgment given on the appeal may be contested only by a single further appeal on a point of law to the Court of Appeal of Gibraltar, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Supreme Court of Gibraltar by way of the case stated;
  
  Article 38 - the reference to the united Kingdom in the second paragraph shall apply to Gibraltar also;
  
  Article 40 - an applicant may appeal against the refusal of an application for enforcement to the Supreme Court of Gibraltar, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Magistrate´s Court;
  
  Article 41 - a judgment on an appeal provided for in Article 40 may be contested only by a single further appeal on a point of law to the Court of Appeal of Gibraltar, or in the case of a maintenance judgment to the Supreme Court of Gibraltar by way of case stated.
  
  
  Alueellinen soveltaminen: Sovelletaan myös Gibraltariin.

• ITALIA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 22.09.1992 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.12.1992
  Varauma:

  Ai sensi dell´Articolo VI del protocollo allegato alla Convenzione di Lugano del 16 settembre 1988, l´Ambasciata informa che l´articolo 2 e l´articolo 4, commi 1 e 2, del Codice italiano di procedura civile (menzionati nell´articolo 3 della Convenzione (di Lugano)) sono stati abrogati dell´articolo 73 della legge del 31 maggio 1995 n. 218 sulla riforma del sistema italiano di diritto internazionale privato.
  
  In conseguenza di cio, l´Articolo 3 della Convenzione di Lugano dovra menzionare, in luogo di quelli abrogati, gli articoli 3 e 4 della legge del 31 maggio 1995 n. 218, che non possono essere invocati nei confronti delle persone aventi il domicilio nel territorio di uno Stato contraente per impedire l´applicazione della Convenzione in oggetto.

• ITÄVALTA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 27.06.1996 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.09.1996
  Varauma:

  The Republic of Austria raises the objection foreseen in Article IV, paragraph 2, of Protocol No 1 on certain questions of jurisdiction, procedure and enforcement.
  
  According to article 32, paragraph 1, the application shall be submitted, in Austria, to the ´Landesgericht´ or the ´Kreisgericht´. According to articles 37, paragraph 1, and 40, paragraph 1, an appeal shall be logged in Austria with the ´Landesgericht´ or the ´Kreisgericht´.
  Pursuant to the modification of § 82 of the ´Exekutionsordnung´ by the ´Exekutionsordnungs-Novelle´ of 1995 (´Bundesgesetz´of August 8, 1995, BGBI. No 519), the ´Bezirksgericht´ is competent, as of October 1, 1995, to declare foreign titles enforceable. Appeals against decisions will equally be lodged with the ´Bezirksgericht´.

• KREIKKA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 11.06.1997 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.09.1997
  Varauma:

  La Grece déclare, en application de l´article 1er du Protocole no. 1 annexé a la Convention, qu´elle se réserve le droit de ne pas reconnaitre ni exécuter les décisions rendues dans les autres Etats Parties lorsque la compétence de la juridiction d´origine est fondée, en application de l´article 16, point 1 b), sur le seul domicile du défendeur dans l´Etat d´origine alors que l´immeuble est situé sur le territoire de la Grece.

• LUXEMBURG

  Sitoutumispäivä: 05.11.1991 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.02.1992

• NORJA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 02.02.1993 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.05.1993

• PORTUGALI

  Sitoutumispäivä: 14.04.1992 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.07.1992

• PUOLA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 01.11.1999 L
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.02.2000
  Varauma:

  Reservation stipulated by the Republic of Poland pursuant to Article 1b of Protocol No. 1 on certain questions of jurisdiction, procedure and enforcement.
  
  The Republic of Poland reserves the right not to recognise or enforce judgements given in other Contracting States if the jurisdiction of the Court of the State of origin is based, pursuant to Article 16(1)(b), exclusively on the domicile of the defendant in the State of origin and the property is situated in the territory of the Republic of Poland.
  
  Statements by the Republic of Poland notified pursuant to Article 63 of the Convention
  
  1. Re. Article 3 of the Convention:
  -Articles 1103 and 1110 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Kodeks postepowania cywilnego) do not apply to the persons designated in Article 3 paragraph 1 of the Convention in the Republic of Poland;
  2. Re. Article 32 of the Convention:
  -In the Republic of Poland applications for approval of enforcement of a decision of a foreign court are to be made to the "sad okregowy";
  3. Re. Article 37 of the Convention:
  In the Republic of Poland, appeals against a judgment of a court of first instance are to be made to the "sad apelacyjny";
  -In the Republic of Poland only cassation (kasacja) of a judgment issued on appeal is permitted;
  4. Re. Article 40 of the Convention:
  -In the Republic of Poland, if an application for approval of enforcement of the decision of the foreign court is rejected, the applicant may appeal to the "sad apelacyjny";
  5. Re. Article 41 of the Convention:
  -In the Republic of Poland only cassation (kasacja) of a judgment isuued on the appeal allowed under Article 40 is permitted;
  6. Re. Article 55 of the Convention: this Convention replaces the following Conventions:
  -The Polish-Austrian Convention on Bilateral Relations in Civil Matters and Concerning Documents, signed in Vienna on 11 December 1963;
  -The Polish-French Convention on Applicable Law, Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgements in the Field of the Law Concerning Individuals and Families, signed in Warsaw on 5 April 1967;
  -The Polish-Greek Convention on Mutual Assistance in Civil and Criminal Matters, signed in Athens on 24 October 1979; and
  -The Polish-Italian Convention on Mutual Assistance and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgements in Civil Matters, signed in Warsaw on 28 April 1989.

• RANSKA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 03.08.1990 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1992
  Varauma:

  Conformément a l´article I ter du Protocole no 1, la République francaise déclare qu´elle se réserve le droit de ne pas reconnaitre ni exécuter les décisions rendues dans les Etats parties lorsque la compétence de la juridiction d´origine est fondée, en application de l´article 16 point 1 sous b, sur le seul domicile du défendeur dans l´Etat d´origine alors que l´immeuble est situé sur le territoire de la République francaise.

• RUOTSI

  Sitoutumispäivä: 09.10.1992 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1993
  Varauma:

  Sweden declares that it objects to the procedure described in Article IV, paragraph 2 of Protocol No. 1, whereby documents may also be sent by the appropriate public officers of the State in which the document has been drawn up directly to the appropriate public officers of the State in which the addressee is to be found.

• SAKSA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 14.12.1994 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.03.1995
  Varauma:

  Germany made the declaration mentioned in article IV, paragraph 2, of the Protocol No. 1 of the Convention on certain questions of jurisdiction, procedure and enforcement, following which judicial and extrajudicial documents drawn up in one Contracting State which have to be served on persons in the Federal Republic of Germany shall be transmitted in accordance with the procedures laid down in the conventions and agreements concluded between these two Contracting States and may not be sent by the appropriate public officers of the State in which the document has been drawn up directly to the appropriate public officers of the Federal Republic of Germany.

• SVEITSI

  Sitoutumispäivä: 18.10.1991 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1992
  Varauma:

  Conformément a l´artcle I bis du Protocole no 1, la Confédération suisse se réserve le droit de ne pas reconnaitre ni exécuter en Suisse un jugement rendu dans un autre Etat contractant lorsque
  
  a) la compétence du tribunal qui a prononcé la décision est
  fondée uniquement sur l´article 5, point 1, de la présente
  Convention;
  
  b) le défendeur avait son domicile en Suisse au moment de
  l´introduction de l´instance; aux fins du présent article,
  une société ou personne morale est considérée comme domiciliée
  en Suisse lorsqu´elle a son siege statuaire et le centre
  effectif de ses activités en Suisse;
  
  c) le défendeur s´oppose a la reconnaissance ou a l´exécution
  du jugement en Suisse, pour autant qu´il n´ait pas renoncé
  a se prévaloir de la déclaration prévue par le présent
  paragraphe.
  
  Conformément a l´article IV, 2e alinéa, du Protocole no 1, la Confédération suisse se réserve le droit d´exiger l´observation d´autres modes de transmission, entre officiers ministrériels, d´actes en provenance et a destination de la Suisse.
  
  On 12 December 2006: En application de l'article VI du Protocole no 1 à la Convention de Lugano concernant la compétence judiciaire et l'exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale du 16 septembre 1988, la Suisse a l'honneur de faire savoir que l'entrée en vigueur en Suisse, le 1er janvier 2007, de la loi sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005, publiée au Recueil officiel du droit fédéral 2006 p. 1205ss, a pour effet de modifier les références des articles 37 al. 2 et 41 relatives à la Suisse, à partir du 1er janvier 2007 dans le sens suivant:
  -en Suisse, que d'un recours devant le Tribunal fédéral/Bundesgericht/Tribunale federale.

• TANSKA

  Sitoutumispäivä: 20.12.1995 R
  Voimaantulopäivä: 01.03.1996
  Varauma:

  ...jusqu´a décision ultérieure, la Convention ne s´appliquera pas aux Iles Féroé et au Groenland.
  
  
  Alueellinen soveltaminen: Ei sovelleta Färsaariin eikä Grönlantiin.
  
  Relativement à l'art.3:
  Loi sur l'organisation judiciaire et de procédure (voies civile et pénale), art. 246, § 2 et 3.
  
  Relativement à l'art. 32:
  Auprès du Tribunal de la ville en question
  
  Relativement à l'art. 37, § 1:
  A la Cour d'appel
  
  Relativement à l'art. 37, § 2:
  En cas d'appel auprès de la Cour suprême, avec l'approbation du Ministère de la justice
  
  Relativement à l'art. 40:
  A la Cour d'appel
  
  Relativement à l'art. 41:
  En cas d'appel auprès de la Cour suprême, avec l'approbation du Ministère de la justice
  
  Relativement à l'art. 55:
  La Convention entre le Danemark, la Finlande, l'Islande, la Norvège et la Suède sur la reconnaissance mutuelle et l'exécution des jugements rendus, signée à Copenhague le 16 mars 1932
  et
  la Convention entre le Danemark, la Finlande, l'Islande, la Norvège et la Suède sur la reconnaissance et l'exécution des décisions judiciaires du droit privé, signée à Copenhague le 11 octobre 1977.
  
  L'organe de compétence visé à l'article 2 du protocole 2 de la Convention de Lugano est au Danemark le Ministère de la Justice.